Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices -> Leads & Electrodes: -> Implantation D-PO04 - Poster Session IV (ID 15) Poster

D-PO04-092 - Impact Of Sub-valvular Lead Tip Position On Qrs And Echocardiographic Indices Among Patients Undergoing His Bundle Pacing (ID 1189)

Abstract

Background: Although His bundle pacing (HBP) lead position may be atrial or sub-valvular, the location of the lead tip and impact on QRS or echocardiographic indices remains uncertain.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to asses HBP lead tip position and impact on QRS width, ventricular function, and tricuspid regurgitation.
Methods: Consecutive HBP patients (2016-2019) with paired transthoracic echocardiographic data were retrospectively analyzed. HBP lead tip was localized as sub-valvular or atrial using 4-chamber and RV inflow views (see Figure). QRS was assessed measuring the intrinsicoid deflection-to-QRS end. Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and tricuspid regurgitation were also evaluated.
Results: Sixty-eight patients were studied: 35% female, 72±14 yrs, with 33 (49%) receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Mean LVEF was 42±17% and baseline QRS was 137±35 ms. Final HBP lead tip position was sub-valvular in 53 (78%), atrial in 14 (21%), and indeterminate in 1 (1%). There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between sub-valvular and atrial HBP patients. Sub-valvular lead tip was associated with significantly improved QRS (138 ms [108-161] to 126 ms [106-134], p=0.003), and with greater QRS narrowing than in the atrial lead position (QRS 139 [98-168] to 123 [108-138], p=0.20). There were no significant differences in change in LVEF or tricuspid regurgitation between groups.
Conclusion: Subvalvular HBP lead position is common and was associated with significant improvement in QRS width, and with comparable improvements in LVEF and TR as patients with atrial HBP lead position.
Collapse